[*-CA] Re: Jeff Pulver and the CRTC

[Jim Van Meggelen]

 wrote:
> I am glad that Pulver's concerns (our concerns) registered with the
> commission. 
> 
> Excerpt:
> 
> -begin-
> 
> 3197 COMMISSIONER COLVILLE: So, is it your view then if we
> saw that sort
> of preferential treatment in terms of packetization, that we should
> take regulatory action to deal with that?
> 
> 3198 MR. PULVER: Yes.

I hope that they follow the lead of the FCC, and treat VoIP like every
other type of data on the net: i.e. not really part of their mandate.

But the tax man's going to want to have a say in that, I imagine, and
the industry is going to lobby hard for their own interests.


> I also thought it was uniquely Canadian that peer to peer was
> transcribed as "pier to pier". :)

>From pier to shining pier . . . 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.0 - Release Date: 17/01/2005